September  2010       

Past Newsletters

COMPLIANCE

Encountered Any Significant Trade Barriers Lately?
If So USTR Wants to Know

As part of its work on its annual National Trade Estimate (NTE), the USTR is asking interested persons to help it identify significant barriers to US exports of goods, services, and US foreign direct investment for inclusion in the NTE.

Once again, they would like comments on standards-related measures and sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) measures that create barriers to U.S. exports to be submitted separately from other NTE comments. This will assist USTR in updating two reports issued for the first time in 2010 highlighting SPS and standards-related measures that may be inconsistent with international trade agreements to which the United States is a party or that otherwise act as significant barriers to U.S. exports. These reports were published as the 2010 Report on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (2010 SPS Report) and the 2010 Report on Technical Barriers to Trade (2010 TBT Report) respectively.

The public should submit written comments on issues for USTR to examine in preparing the NTE and the reports on SPS and standards-related measures. Comments are due October 4. Further details and instructions for submitting comments can be found here.


 U.S. TIGHTENS IRAN SANCTIONS

IMPORT/EXPORT

Duty Suspension Package Clears Congress


United States Wins WTO Dispute with EU on High-Tech Products


NEW REGULATION FOR DANGEROUS GOODS DECLARATION


Possible Legislative Changes to the Shipping Act

Ex-Im Bank Changes Policy to Increase Financing


OFAC Issues Lebanon Sanctions Regulations


Port of LA Will Phase in Clean-Truck Mandate


Challenges Arising with AES And Exports Through Canada

CUSTOMS/SECURITY

LARGEST WEST COAST SEIZURE OF COUNTERFEIT ITEMS

Government officials from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and the U.S. Attorney’s office raided a total of 8 retail stores on Fisherman’s Wharf, San Francisco, California after a three year investigation into the flow of counterfeit goods from China.  The investigation began in 2007 after custom officials “seized a container at the Port of Oakland stuffed with 50,000 counterfeit designer accessories.”  Investigators followed the flow of counterfeit goods, and in the process identified a network of people and associated retailed stores, allegedly engaged with importing over 70 imitated national and international brands, from China.  During the August 3, 2010 raids, federal officials seized more than 200,000 counterfeit goods with trademarked names including Nike, Burberry, Kate Spade, Louis Vuitton, Dolce & Gabbana and Armani among others, attached to phony goods.  If the products has been legitimate trademarked goods the products seized would have been worth more than $100 million.  SC ISAC Bulletin, 8/11/2010.

If you are importing goods protected by trademark law, you the importer must hold a letter of authorization directly from the trademark holder.   If you have permission to import from a third party who is not the trademark holder your goods could be seized by Customs.   Be sure you fully understand your obligations and requirements to import goods that bear a trademark of any kind.  For more information on Intellectual Property rights see the Customs website at http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/trade/priority_trade/ipr/

click for full newsletter

 

The Goal Newsletter is an online international trade information service, published electronically by Goal (publisher) The publisher has taken all reasonable steps to verify the accuracy of the content of this site. The publisher does not and will not at any time accept any responsibility or otherwise be liable for any loss or damage whatsoever that you may suffer as a result information contained in this newsletter. Links are provided for your convenience only. Accessing links to third party Web sites and use of or reliance upon third party material is solely at your own risk.

NOTE: Information contained herein is of necessity a summary of complicated and fact-specific issues. It is not intended to convey legal advice, and receipt of it does not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship. Before you act on any information provided in this document, you should seek professional advice regarding its applicability to your specific circumstances.

Copyright © 2010 Goal - All Rights Reserved